Supported by
China to Retry Canadian on Drugs Charge Amid Diplomatic Spat
By Chris Buckley and Dan Bilefsky
BEIJING — A Chinese court on Saturday ordered the retrial of a Canadian man on a drug-smuggling charge after prosecutors argued that his original 15-year prison sentence for his conviction had been too light, most likely creating another source of contention between two countries whose relations have deteriorated rapidly this month after a string of arrests.
The Canadian, Robert Lloyd Schellenberg, was arrested in 2014 and tried and sentenced in obscurity. But he is likely to became a focus of attention in Canada after the court in Dalian, a port city in northeast China, responded to his appeal against a sentence he received last month by siding with prosecutors who argued that he had been punished too lightly.
If the prosecutors prevail in the retrial, Mr. Schellenberg could be sentenced to a longer term, or even the death penalty, at a time when China and Canada are locked in an escalating dispute that began with the arrest in Vancouver of a prominent Chinese technology executive.
According to a report from China’s official court news service, prosecutors told the high court of Liaoning Province, where the case was heard, that the trial court decision had underplayed Mr. Schellenberg’s crimes. Emerging evidence, they said, indicated that he “very likely participated in organized international drug trafficking activities, and played an important role in smuggling the drugs.”
The report did not say how Mr. Schellenberg responded to the prosecutors’ claims Experts said before the hearing on Saturday that the Chinese government could use his case to turn up pressure on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada.
“Mr. Schellenberg’s arrest in 2014 and subsequent court process starting in 2016 was not made public, so this is both unexpected and a cause for concern,” said Charles Burton, a former Canadian diplomat who served in Beijing and now teaches at Brock University in Ontario.
“If Mr. Schellenberg is condemned to death, Canadians would be distressed as Canada abolished the death penalty completely many years ago,” he added.
The appeal hearing came at the end of a month when ties between Ottawa and Beijing deteriorated sharply. Earlier this month, Canada arrested Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of the Chinese technology company Huawei, at the request of prosecutors in New York who accuse her of committing fraud to help the company evade United States sanctions against Iran.
Ms. Meng was released on bail in Vancouver, and Canadian legal authorities will decide whether she should be extradited to the United States — a decision that she could fight in Canadian courts.
More than a week after her arrest, the Chinese police arrested two Canadians — a former diplomat, Michael Kovrig; and a businessman, Michael Spavor — in what experts said appeared to be a bid to seek leverage over Ms. Meng’s fate. A Canadian caught in China and accused of working without a valid visa was also held for a short time.
Mr. Schellenberg was pitched into these tensions on Wednesday, after a news website in Dalian took note of his appeal hearing, and other Chinese news outlets began covering the case, including The Global Times, a strident English-language tabloid controlled by the Communist Party.
Referring to the Global Times report, Wenran Jiang, a senior fellow at the Institute of Asian Research at the University of British Columbia, said that it was unclear whether the Chinese government was directly behind the story, but that China seemed to be pointing fingers at Canada at a time when Canada was accusing China of breaching the rule of law.
“The message seems to be ‘Look, here you have another Canadian disobeying law and order in China — pay attention,’ ” he said.
Chinese courts are controlled by the Communist Party, and they rarely find defendants not guilty. Mr. Schellenberg was tried in March 2016, but the court handed down its verdict and sentence last month. If he is sentenced to death at the retrial, China’s highest court would first review the decision, and Canadian diplomats would almost certainly press for a less-severe punishment.
Between 2009 and 2015, at least 19 foreigners were executed in China for drug trafficking, said John Kamm, chairman of the Dui Hua Foundation, a group based in San Francisco that monitors human rights in China. The court could also endorse a death sentence with a two-year reprieve, which would almost surely be converted to a long prison term, he said.
The Canadian authorities have so far sought to play down any link between the Schellenberg and Huawei cases.
“Global Affairs Canada has been following this case for several years and has been providing consular assistance to the Canadian citizen since they were first detained,” the Canadian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Friday. It said privacy laws prevented it from giving more information.
But some commentators in Canada, alarmed by the recent arrests, saw a more ominous purpose behind the highly publicized reopening of Mr. Schellenberg’s case.
An article in The National Post, a conservative Canadian newspaper, said Mr. Schellenberg “might now be a pawn in the much bigger legal battle over Canada’s arrest of a Huawei tech company executive.”
Michael Byers, a professor of politics and international law at the University of British Columbia, said that while there was no direct connection between Mr. Schellenberg’s initial arrest and the Huawei investigation, the Chinese government could try to link the cases now. Equally, it could show leniency and try to “dial down the temperature” in the current crisis between China and Canada.
“It is conceivable that there could be political involvement,” he said.
Whatever happens to Mr. Schellenberg, the diplomatic strains exposed this month seem likely to persist.
In an interview about Mr. Spavor and Mr. Kovrig this month, David Mulroney, a former Canadian ambassador to Beijing, said the arrests were a warning for Canada and other Western countries engaging with China in the hope that it would evolve into a moderate, law-abiding nation.
“China has not learned to embrace the rule of law and reforms,” he said. “The West needs to hold China more accountable.”
Chris Buckley reported from Beijing, and Dan Bilefsky from Montreal. Zoe Mou contributed research from Beijing.
Related Coverage
Advertisement
Bagikan Berita Ini
Related Posts :
North Korea 'won't disarm if sanctions continue', minister says- US and Canada Are Close to Signing Nafta Deal This Weekend
- The Latest: Canada delays UN speech amid trade talks with US
- Russia, North Korea use UN General Assembly to blast US
- Indonesia earthquake, tsunami death toll tops 400, hundreds more injured
0 Response to "China to Retry Canadian on Drugs Charge Amid Diplomatic Spat - The New York Times"
Post a Comment